by Alora Young
The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao
Junot Díaz’s The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao begins with poetic imagery that is beautiful and formal, and that creates emotion in us instantly:
“They say it came from Africa, carried on the screams of the enslaved; that it was the death bane of the Tainos, uttered just as one world perished and another began; that it was a demon drawn into Creation through the nightmare door that was cracked open in the Antilles.”
The next paragraph, however, starts with “ain’t” and “shit” and how “Everybody knew someone who’d been eaten by a fukú”. This complete change of tone is just one demonstration of how Díaz uses language in this novel. He also commonly uses Spanish words and phrases, “big words [Oscar] had memorized only the day before” and sci-fi and comic book references, which, let’s be honest, are a language of their own too. Then there are the constant changes of tone. What we read about Oscar in Chapter One has an entirely different tone than what we read about his sister Lola in Chapter Two. Both, are again, very different from the tone we hear when learning about Oscar and Lola’s mother Beli in Chapter Three. This can be explained by the fact that each of these sections has a different person telling the story.
Oscar’s section is told from our narrator’s point of view. He achieves a somewhat informal tone, what with the swearing in both English and Spanish and all the ‘like’s and mostly casual footnotes. It’s a conversational tone that manages to stay just on the right side of charming. He makes the otherwise unlikeable Oscar likeable, poking fun at him in a way that shows he genuinely cares and worries about him, which makes us care about him. Then we move onto Lola’s story, which is written in first person. We assume that this is because Lola told our narrator the story this way, and he knew that conveying it to us the way she did to him would provoke the intended emotions. From Lola’s point of view, the swearing all but ceases to exist, while the Spanish continues to serve as a cultural reference and device in character development.
The different vernaculars used in The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao not only establish character and setting and convey emotion, but they also serve the purpose of slightly alienating the reader. In an interview, Junot Díaz said that when reading this book you’re supposed to feel like an immigrant, as the characters are. It creates a connection that many people throughout the world, let alone white American readers could not find otherwise. Also, since this book is in a large part about a love of reading, Díaz commented that it highlights our ability to skip over things we don’t understand in books and just continue on, because that is a large part of reading. I think this use of language is very clever, and it has certainly given me a greater appreciation and desire to read this book through to conclusion.
This is very clear and very carefully argued. NICE WORK.
ReplyDeleteTwo suggestions:
1) I would continue your use of direct quotes from the book in the second and third paragraphs. Especially when you're discussing language, you can characterize an author's use of language, but it's absolutely crucial that you give us examples to help illustrate your characterization. So when you say that Junior is "poking fun at [Oscar] in a way that shows he genuinely cares and worries about him, which makes us care about him" give us an example of when Junior does this. It's one thing for you to TELL us that he's doing this; it's another thing if you TELL us and then SHOW us. We have to be convinced when these two aspects are in place.
2) I would like to see more from the third paragraph. You touch on two really important topics (the alienation of the reader and the love of reading), but you don't really explore them very much. While the first two paragraphs do a good job of giving the details that led you to your conclusion, this analysis section is a little weak. HOW do these different voices and languages make us feel like an immigrant? Yes, Diaz SAYS this, but why do you feel like it's true? How can a book that blatantly attempts to alienate the reader be a book about the love of reading? These are all answerable questions, I think, but you need to explore how they resonate for you in light of your textual details from the previous paragraphs.
But overall, this is very clear and absolutely the kind of thing I'm looking for. Your language is simple but very effective, and your specific details make clear, logical sense. Just work on exploring the interpretation of these examples to their fullest potential.
=9
e
Oh, and I forgot: Junior is spelled with a "Y"=Yunior. SORRY!
ReplyDeletee